Crucial T710

Crucial T710

Crucial
88 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R

Seagate FireCuda 530R

Seagate
88 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Crucial T710

78 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

The Crucial T710 PCIe Gen5 NVMe SSD is generally well-received, with users praising its fast speeds, especially in real-world workloads like data processing and gaming. Many note that it requires a heatsink to manage temperatures. However, one verified buyer reported a drive failure after 7 months and difficulties with Crucial's warranty support, which is a significant concern.

Pros
  • Fast Gen5 speeds
  • Great for heavy workloads
  • Good value for money
  • Runs cool with heatsink
  • Easy installation
Cons
  • Requires heatsink
  • Warranty support issues
  • Drive failure risk
  • Windows formatting issues
👍 Performance 8
🤔 Heat management 3
👍 Value for money 2
👎 Warranty support 2
👎 Reliability 1
👍 Installation 2

Seagate FireCuda 530R

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This SSD is praised for its exceptional durability and high endurance, with a 5-year warranty and Rescue Services adding peace of mind. Users highlight its blazing-fast sequential read and write speeds, which are ideal for gaming and heavy workloads. The support for DirectStorage is a plus for modern gaming setups. However, some users note that compatibility with all computers may not be guaranteed, so checking system requirements is advised.

Pros
  • 5-year warranty
  • Rescue Services included
  • High endurance (5,050TBW)
  • Fast sequential read/write
  • DirectStorage support
Cons
  • Compatibility not guaranteed
  • May not fit all computers
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

Scores

Laptop
Crucial
95
Seagate
74
Workstation
Crucial
90
Seagate
83
Gaming
Crucial
90
Seagate
84
Budget
Crucial
87
Seagate
81
Console
Crucial
84
Seagate
84
Portable
Crucial
23
Seagate
22

Specifications

Crucial T710Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
1,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,800
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,300,000
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✓★✗
Controller—E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
1,200
5,050
MTBF (hours)No data
1,800,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✗✓★
Hardware Encryption✗—

Pros & Cons

Crucial T710

  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile

Seagate FireCuda 530R

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong speed (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (14th percentile)14th %ile

Pricing

Crucial T710 is $286 cheaper (2.1x less).

Crucial T7100.348score per dollar
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R0.162score per dollar

Crucial T710 offers 2.1x better value for money

Verdict

═ Tie

Both products are closely matched - Crucial T710 wins 6 specs while Seagate FireCuda 530R wins 4.

Crucial T710 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopWorkstation

Also Consider