Team Group T-FORCE G50

Team Group T-FORCE G50

Team Group
66 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R

Seagate FireCuda 530R

Seagate
92 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Team Group T-FORCE G50

82 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

This SSD is generally well-received, with users praising its speed, value, and performance in NAS and gaming setups. Some minor drawbacks include the need to manually attach heatsinks and the presence of a status LED that some find unnecessary. Overall, it's seen as a solid, affordable choice for everyday users and enthusiasts alike.

Pros
  • Fast read/write speeds
  • Good value for money
  • Works well in NAS
  • Easy installation
  • Reliable performance
Cons
  • Manual heatsink attachment
  • Unnecessary status LED
  • Not top-tier speed
👍 Speed 4
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Ease of installation 2
🤔 Build quality 2
🤔 Thermal management 2
👎 Led indicator 1

Seagate FireCuda 530R

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This SSD is praised for its exceptional durability and high endurance, with a 5-year warranty and Rescue Services adding peace of mind. Users highlight its blazing-fast sequential read and write speeds, which are ideal for gaming and heavy workloads. The support for DirectStorage is a plus for modern gaming setups. However, some users note that compatibility with all computers may not be guaranteed, so checking system requirements is advised.

Pros
  • 5-year warranty
  • Rescue Services included
  • High endurance (5,050TBW)
  • Fast sequential read/write
  • DirectStorage support
Cons
  • Compatibility not guaranteed
  • May not fit all computers
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

Scores

Laptop
Team Group
57
Seagate
93
Budget
Team Group
65
Seagate
89
Gaming
Team Group
51
Seagate
88
Console
Team Group
42
Seagate
85
Workstation
Team Group
60
Seagate
84
Portable
Team Group
16
Seagate
24

Specifications

Team Group T-FORCE G50Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
512
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
5,000
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
2,500
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllerInnoGritE18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
325
5,050
MTBF (hours)
3,000,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✓★✗

Pros & Cons

Team Group T-FORCE G50

  • Strong endurance (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Strong speed (65th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (34th percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Pricing

Team Group T-FORCE G50 is $797 cheaper (9.2x less).

Team Group T-FORCE G500.678score per dollar
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R0.103score per dollar

Team Group T-FORCE G50 offers 6.6x better value for money

Team Group T-FORCE G50

Seagate FireCuda 530R

Verdict

★ Winner: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 92 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.

Seagate FireCuda 530R Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Also Consider