SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100

SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100

SanDisk
90 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R

Seagate FireCuda 530R

Seagate
88 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

The WD Black SN8100 is overwhelmingly praised for its blazing Gen5 speeds, with users reporting double the performance of previous Gen4 drives and boot times of just a few seconds. Reviewers highlight excellent heat management, easy installation, and reliability, though many note the high price as a significant drawback. Overall, it's seen as a top-tier upgrade for those with compatible hardware and budget.

Pros
  • Blazing Gen5 speeds
  • Excellent heat management
  • Easy installation
  • Reliable performance
  • Great for gaming
Cons
  • High price
  • Requires Gen5 motherboard
  • Pricey for many
👍 Performance speed 12
👍 Heat management 5
🤔 Value for money 6
👍 Ease of installation 4
👍 Reliability 4
🤔 Compatibility 3

Seagate FireCuda 530R

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This SSD is praised for its exceptional durability and high endurance, with a 5-year warranty and Rescue Services adding peace of mind. Users highlight its blazing-fast sequential read and write speeds, which are ideal for gaming and heavy workloads. The support for DirectStorage is a plus for modern gaming setups. However, some users note that compatibility with all computers may not be guaranteed, so checking system requirements is advised.

Pros
  • 5-year warranty
  • Rescue Services included
  • High endurance (5,050TBW)
  • Fast sequential read/write
  • DirectStorage support
Cons
  • Compatibility not guaranteed
  • May not fit all computers
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

Scores

Gaming
SanDisk
91
Seagate
84
Workstation
SanDisk
89
Seagate
83
Laptop
SanDisk
89
Seagate
74
Console
SanDisk
86
Seagate
84
Budget
SanDisk
75
Seagate
81
Portable
SanDisk
24
Seagate
22

Specifications

SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
4,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
14,000
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)
2,300,000
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,300,000
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache—✗
Controller—E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
5,050
MTBF (hours)No data
1,800,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink—✓★

Pros & Cons

SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100

  • Strong speed (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile

Seagate FireCuda 530R

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong speed (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (14th percentile)14th %ile

Pricing

Seagate FireCuda 530R is $332 cheaper (1.6x less).

SanDisk WD_BLACK SN81000.103score per dollar
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R0.162score per dollar

Seagate FireCuda 530R offers 1.6x better value for money

SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100

Verdict

═ Tie

Both products are closely matched - SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100 wins 5 specs while Seagate FireCuda 530R wins 3.

SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100 Better at:

GamingLaptopWorkstation

Seagate FireCuda 530R Better at:

Budget

Also Consider