Ediloca EN680E
Ediloca
41 Overall Score
vs
Team Group T-FORCE G50
Team Group
66 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Ediloca EN680E
No customer feedback yet
Team Group T-FORCE G50
82 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews
This SSD is generally well-received, with users praising its speed, value, and performance in NAS and gaming setups. Some minor drawbacks include the need to manually attach heatsinks and the presence of a status LED that some find unnecessary. Overall, it's seen as a solid, affordable choice for everyday users and enthusiasts alike.
Pros
- Fast read/write speeds
- Good value for money
- Works well in NAS
- Easy installation
- Reliable performance
Cons
- Manual heatsink attachment
- Unnecessary status LED
- Not top-tier speed
Speed 4
Value for money 3
Ease of installation 2
Build quality 2
Thermal management 2
Led indicator 1
Scores
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Gaming
Console
Portable
Specifications
| Ediloca EN680E | Team Group T-FORCE G50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 3 | 4★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Controller | — | InnoGrit |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | No data | |
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 3 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Ediloca EN680E
- Strong feature (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Below average capacity (7th percentile)7th %ile
Team Group T-FORCE G50
- Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong endurance (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong feature (79th percentile)
- Strong speed (68th percentile)
- Below average capacity (34th percentile)
Pricing
Ediloca EN680E1.269score per dollar
vs
Team Group T-FORCE G500.678score per dollar
Ediloca EN680E offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Team Group T-FORCE G50
Scores 66 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 15 specs.
