Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung
42 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

No customer feedback yet

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This SSD is praised for its exceptional durability and high endurance, with a 5-year warranty and Rescue Services adding peace of mind. Users highlight its blazing-fast sequential read and write speeds, which are ideal for gaming and heavy workloads. The support for DirectStorage is a plus for modern gaming setups. However, some users note that compatibility with all computers may not be guaranteed, so checking system requirements is advised.

Pros
  • 5-year warranty
  • Rescue Services included
  • High endurance (5,050TBW)
  • Fast sequential read/write
  • DirectStorage support
Cons
  • Compatibility not guaranteed
  • May not fit all computers
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

Scores

Laptop
Samsung
45
Seagate
91
Gaming
Samsung
45
Seagate
86
Console
Samsung
23
Seagate
84
Workstation
Samsung
43
Seagate
83
Budget
Samsung
43
Seagate
73
Portable
Samsung
12
Seagate
24

Specifications

Samsung 970 EVO PlusSeagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
1,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation34★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
3,500
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
2,300
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache—✗
Controller—E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)No data
5,050
MTBF (hours)No data
1,800,000
Warranty (years)—5★
Features
Heatsink—✗

Pros & Cons

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average affordability (26th percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

Pricing

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 is $544 cheaper (2.6x less).

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.120score per dollar
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.102score per dollar

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 offers 1.2x better value for money

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Verdict

★ Winner: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.

Seagate FireCuda 530R Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Also Consider