Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Inland
52 Overall Score
vs
Silicon Power A55 128GB SATA III 2.5"

Silicon Power A55 128GB SATA III 2.5"

Silicon Power
33 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

No customer feedback yet

Silicon Power A55 128GB SATA III 2.5"

82 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

Users generally praise this budget SSD for its excellent value, easy installation, and significant speed improvements over traditional HDDs, especially for reviving older systems or as boot drives for servers and NAS builds. While some note that higher-end drives like the Samsung 860 Pro offer better performance and longer warranties, most agree that for everyday tasks and cost-conscious buyers, this drive performs admirably. A few isolated issues were mentioned, such as one drive going read-only (though RMA was smooth) and a lack of mounting screws, but overall sentiment is highly positive.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Easy installation
  • Significant speed boost over HDD
  • Great for reviving old systems
  • Reliable for boot drives in servers/NAS
Cons
  • Lower performance than high-end SSDs
  • Shorter warranty than competitors
  • No mounting screws included
  • Potential for drive failure (rare)
  • Not for heavy workloads
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Performance 7
👍 Ease of installation 5
🤔 Reliability 5
👍 Suitability for old systems 4
🤔 Warranty and support 3

Scores

Workstation
Inland
54
Silicon Power
27
Laptop
Inland
50
Silicon Power
25
Budget
Inland
42
Silicon Power
34
Gaming
Inland
39
Silicon Power
21
Console
Inland
18
Silicon Power
10
Portable
Inland
11
Silicon Power
8

Specifications

Inland TN320Silicon Power A55
Drive
Capacity
256
128
Form FactorM.2 22802.5"
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation3★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
2,000
550
Sequential Write (MB/s)
1,600
450
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache—✗
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
1,200
No data
MTBF (hours)
2,000,000
No data
Warranty (years)6★1
Features
Heatsink—✗

Pros & Cons

Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile

Silicon Power A55 128GB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average speed (22nd percentile)
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average endurance (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Silicon Power A55 128GB SATA III 2.5" is $36 cheaper (2.4x less).

Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.858score per dollar
vs
Silicon Power A55 128GB SATA III 2.5"1.356score per dollar

Silicon Power A55 128GB SATA III 2.5" offers 1.6x better value for money

Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Silicon Power A55 128GB SATA III 2.5"

Verdict

★ Winner: Inland TN320

Scores 52 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 14 specs.

Inland TN320 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Also Consider