Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Inland
51 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 540 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Seagate
73 Overall Score
Scores
Workstation
Laptop
Gaming
Console
Budget
Portable
Specifications
| Inland TN320 | Seagate FireCuda 540 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 3 | 5★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | No data | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | No data | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | — | ✗ |
| Controller | — | E26 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 6★ | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | — | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Below average capacity (17th percentile)17th %ile
Seagate FireCuda 540 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong endurance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Pricing
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.857score per dollar
vs
Seagate FireCuda 540 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.431score per dollar
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 offers 2.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Seagate FireCuda 540
Scores 73 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.
