Crucial T710
Crucial
95 Overall Score
vs
Samsung 870 EVO
Samsung
49 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Crucial T710
No customer feedback yet
Samsung 870 EVO
85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews
Users are very satisfied with this SSD, praising its performance, value for money, and suitability for older systems. The verified reviews highlight excellent price and fast shipping, while Q&A confirms compatibility and RAID support. Overall, it's a reliable choice for upgrades.
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Fast shipping
- Works well with older systems
- Good performance
- Supports RAID setup
Cons
- Limited sample size
- No negative feedback mentioned
Performance 2
Value for money 2
Compatibility 2
Shipping speed 1
Raid support 1
Scores
Console
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Portable
Specifications
| Crucial T710 | Samsung 870 EVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | 2.5" |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | SATA III |
| Protocol | NVMe | SATA |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | No data | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | No data | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Controller | Micron | MKX |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | No data | |
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | ✗ | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Crucial T710
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
Samsung 870 EVO
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong endurance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (65th percentile)
- Below average random (22nd percentile)
- Below average capacity (26th percentile)
Pricing
Crucial T7100.159score per dollar
vs
Samsung 870 EVO0.204score per dollar
Samsung 870 EVO offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Crucial T710
Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.
