Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280

Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280

Team Group
38 Overall Score
vs
Crucial T710 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial T710 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial
88 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280

38 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews

This budget M.2 SATA SSD receives mixed reviews. While some users find it a cheap, simple upgrade for basic tasks, several report severe issues like random freezes, early failure signs within a month, and a lack of DRAM cache leading to increased wear. The drive is not recommended for heavy workloads, and some suggest spending more on a reputable brand like Samsung.

Pros
  • cheap price
  • simple upgrade for basic tasks
  • fast and stable for light use
  • compatible with older laptops
  • good for aesthetics (cable-free)
Cons
  • no DRAM cache
  • random freezes
  • early failure signs
  • mediocre endurance (60TBW)
  • not for heavy workloads
🤔 Performance 5
👎 Reliability 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👎 Dram cache 3
👍 Compatibility 3
🤔 Heat generation 2

Crucial T710 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

78 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

The Crucial T710 PCIe Gen5 NVMe SSD is generally well-received, with users praising its fast speeds, especially in real-world workloads like data processing and gaming. Many note that it requires a heatsink to manage temperatures. However, one verified buyer reported a drive failure after 7 months and difficulties with Crucial's warranty support, which is a significant concern.

Pros
  • Fast Gen5 speeds
  • Great for heavy workloads
  • Good value for money
  • Runs cool with heatsink
  • Easy installation
Cons
  • Requires heatsink
  • Warranty support issues
  • Drive failure risk
  • Windows formatting issues
👍 Performance 8
🤔 Heat management 3
👍 Value for money 2
👎 Warranty support 2
👎 Reliability 1
👍 Installation 2

Scores

Workstation
Team Group
39
Crucial
89
Gaming
Team Group
26
Crucial
87
Console
Team Group
13
Crucial
86
Budget
Team Group
53
Crucial
83
Laptop
Team Group
46
Crucial
76
Portable
Team Group
10
Crucial
23

Specifications

Team Group MS30Crucial T710
Drive
Capacity
512
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—5★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
530
14,900
Sequential Write (MB/s)
430
13,800
Random Read (IOPS)No data
2,200,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
2,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✓★
Controller—Micron
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
256
600
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
1,500,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink—✓★
Hardware Encryption—✗

Pros & Cons

Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (76th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average speed (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average capacity (34th percentile)

Crucial T710 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong endurance (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280 is $167 cheaper (2.9x less).

Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 22800.432score per dollar
vs
Crucial T710 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.345score per dollar

Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280 offers 1.3x better value for money

Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280

Crucial T710 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Verdict

★ Winner: Crucial T710

Scores 88 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

Crucial T710 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Also Consider