fanxiang 690Q
fanxiang
53 Overall Score
vs
Kingston KC3000
Kingston
80 Overall Score
Scores
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Budget
Laptop
Portable
Specifications
| fanxiang 690Q | Kingston KC3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | No data | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | No data | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | QLC | TLC★ |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Controller | — | Phison E18 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | No data | |
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | 3 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
fanxiang 690Q
- Strong endurance (73rd percentile)
- Below average capacity (26th percentile)
- Below average feature (32nd percentile)
Kingston KC3000
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong random (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong endurance (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong speed (80th percentile)80th %ile
Pricing
fanxiang 690Q0.525score per dollar
vs
Kingston KC30000.295score per dollar
fanxiang 690Q offers 1.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Kingston KC3000
Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.
