Crucial T710

Crucial T710

Crucial
93 Overall Score
vs
Lexar NM790

Lexar NM790

Lexar
81 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Crucial
97
Lexar
85
Gaming
Crucial
96
Lexar
79
Console
Crucial
95
Lexar
76
Workstation
Crucial
94
Lexar
74
Laptop
Crucial
85
Lexar
88
Portable
Crucial
25
Lexar
21

Specifications

Crucial T710Lexar NM790
Drive
Capacity
2,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,800
6,500
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
1,000,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,300,000
900,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✓★✗
ControllerMicron G9—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
1,200
1,000
MTBF (hours)No data
1,500,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★✗
Hardware Encryption✗✗

Pros & Cons

Crucial T710

  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong feature (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile

Lexar NM790

  • Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong random (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong speed (89th percentile)89th %ile

Pricing

Lexar NM790 is $150 cheaper (1.8x less).

Crucial T7100.267score per dollar
vs
Lexar NM7900.406score per dollar

Lexar NM790 offers 1.5x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Crucial T710

Scores 93 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.

Crucial T710 Better at:

BudgetGamingConsolePortableWorkstation

Lexar NM790 Better at:

Laptop

Also Consider