Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
Crucial
69 Overall Score
vs
Kingston KVR24S17S8/8
Kingston
41 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A | Kingston KVR24S17S8/8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 260 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 22 | 17★ |
| Timings | 22-22-22 | — |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158 | 1.2000000476837158 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
Kingston KVR24S17S8/8
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average speed (29th percentile)
Pricing
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A0.472score per dollar
vs
Kingston KVR24S17S8/80.566score per dollar
Kingston KVR24S17S8/8 offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
Scores 69 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
