Corsair Vengeance LPX
Corsair
82 Overall Score
vs
Timetec 7
Timetec
40 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Corsair Vengeance LPX
88 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews
Users are overwhelmingly positive about this RAM, praising its performance, value, and compatibility with various AMD and Intel platforms. Many highlight the ease of enabling XMP profiles to reach 3600MHz, and the low-profile design is a plus for compact builds. A few mention needing BIOS updates or checking motherboard QVLs, but overall it's seen as reliable and a great buy.
Pros
- Excellent performance
- Great value for money
- Easy XMP overclocking
- Low-profile design
- Compatible with AMD and Intel
Cons
- May require BIOS update
- Not on some QVL lists
- Mixing kits may fail
- No RGB lighting
Performance 8
Value for money 5
Compatibility 7
Overclocking 6
Build quality 4
Design 4
Timetec 7
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| Corsair Vengeance LPX | Timetec 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 260 |
| Rank | — | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 18 | 17★ |
| Timings | 18-22-22-42 | — |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Corsair Vengeance LPX
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (78th percentile)
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
Timetec 7
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average speed (29th percentile)
Pricing
Corsair Vengeance LPX0.391score per dollar
vs
Timetec 70.724score per dollar
Timetec 7 offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Corsair Vengeance LPX
Scores 82 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
