G.Skill Ripjaws V
G.Skill
75 Overall Score
vs
Kingston ValueRAM
Kingston
53 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
G.Skill Ripjaws V
No customer feedback yet
Kingston ValueRAM
75 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews
Users are generally satisfied with this memory module, noting good performance and easy installation. Some concerns about power consumption and durability were raised, but overall sentiment is positive.
Pros
- Good performance
- Easy installation
- Broad compatibility
Cons
- Power consumption concerns
- Durability questions
Performance 1
Installation ease 1
Compatibility 1
Power consumption 1
Durability 1
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| G.Skill Ripjaws V | Kingston ValueRAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 260 |
| Rank | — | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16★ | 22 |
| Timings | 16-18-18-38 | 22-22-22-52 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
G.Skill Ripjaws V
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
Kingston ValueRAM
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Pricing
G.Skill Ripjaws V0.334score per dollar
vs
Kingston ValueRAM0.704score per dollar
Kingston ValueRAM offers 2.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: G.Skill Ripjaws V
Scores 75 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
