Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Titanium Whitesilver 256GB
Samsung
96 Overall Score
vs
Google Pixel 9a Iris 128GB
Google
32 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Titanium Whitesilver 256GB
82 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising its stunning display, exceptional camera, fast performance, and long battery life. Open-box units from third-party sellers are generally in mint condition, though a few buyers reported minor issues like missing SIM ejector pins or delivery problems. A couple of negative reviews mention overheating and warranty concerns, but the overall sentiment is highly favorable.
Pros
- Stunning display
- Exceptional camera quality
- Fast performance
- Long battery life
- Premium design
Cons
- Overheating issues
- Missing SIM ejector pin
- Delivery problems
- Warranty concerns
- Premium price
Display quality 6
Camera quality 8
Performance 7
Battery life 7
Open box condition 6
Delivery experience 2
Google Pixel 9a Iris 128GB
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Foldable
Gaming
Flagship
Photography
Battery Life
Business
Rugged
Compact
Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Google Pixel 9a | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 6.9 | 6.3 |
| Display Type | AMOLED★ | OLED |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 | — |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Brightness | 2600 nits★ | — |
| HDR | ✓★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | 3.1 GHz |
| Processor Model | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | AMD A4-3305M |
| CPU Cores | 8★ | — |
| CPU Speed | 4.47★ | 3.10 |
| RAM | 12 GB★ | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB★ | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0★ | — |
| Expandable | ✗ | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 200 MP★ | — |
| Camera Count | 4★ | — |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP★ | — |
| Telephoto | 10 MP★ | — |
| Front Camera | 12 MP★ | — |
| Optical Zoom | 3x, 10x★ | — |
| Video | 8K@30fps★ | — |
| OIS | ✓★ | — |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 5,000 mAh★ | — |
| Wired Charging | 45W★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Fast Charging | Adaptive Fast Charging | — |
| Connector | USB-C★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| NFC | ✓★ | — |
| USB | USB-C★ | — |
| SIM | Nano SIM | eSIM |
| eSIM | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | 0.22 kg★ | — |
| Fingerprint | in-display | — |
| Face Recognition | ✓★ | — |
| OS | Android | Android |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✗ |
| Stereo Speakers | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Titanium Whitesilver 256GB
- Strong camera (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
Google Pixel 9a Iris 128GB
- Below average camera (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average battery (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average performance (34th percentile)
Pricing
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Titanium Whitesilver 256GB0.096score per dollar
vs
Google Pixel 9a Iris 128GB0.066score per dollar
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Titanium Whitesilver 256GB offers 1.5x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 27 of 42 specs.
