Nokia 110 TA-1667 Titanium 128GB
Nokia
15 Overall Score
vs
Motorola Razr ultra 2025 Pantone Scarab 512GB
Motorola
92 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Nokia 110 TA-1667 Titanium 128GB
No customer feedback yet
Motorola Razr ultra 2025 Pantone Scarab 512GB
92 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with users praising its build quality, bright screens, and excellent battery life. Many appreciate the convenience of the front display and the ability to use the phone compactly or open it for a larger screen. A few minor issues were mentioned, such as occasional video lag and a visible crease when swiping, but overall, users consider it a top-tier flip phone and a great value.
Pros
- Excellent build quality
- Bright and vibrant screens
- Great battery life
- Fast charging
- Convenient front display
Cons
- Occasional video lag
- Visible crease when swiping
- Google News recommendations annoying
- Needs a case for durability
Build quality 4
Battery life 5
Display quality 5
Camera quality 4
Front display usability 4
Performance smoothness 3
Scores
Compact
Gaming
Budget
Foldable
Battery Life
Flagship
Business
Photography
Rugged
Specifications
| Nokia 110 TA-1667 | Motorola Razr ultra 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | — | 7.0 |
| Display Type | LCD | OLED★ |
| Resolution | — | 2960 x 1440 |
| Refresh Rate | — | 165 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 4500 nits★ |
| HDR | — | ✓★ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | — | Snapdragon 8 Elite Mobile Platform |
| Processor Model | — | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| CPU Speed | — | 3.53★ |
| RAM | — | 16 GB★ |
| Storage | 128 GB | 512 GB★ |
| Expandable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | — | 50 MP★ |
| Camera Count | — | 2★ |
| Ultrawide | — | 50 MP★ |
| Front Camera | — | 50 MP★ |
| Optical Zoom | — | 30x★ |
| Video | — | 8K@30fps★ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 1,450 mAh | 4,700 mAh★ |
| Wired Charging | — | 68W★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Fast Charging | — | TurboPower |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| NFC | — | ✓★ |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB-C★ |
| SIM | Dual SIM | eSIM, Standard SIM |
| eSIM | — | ✓★ |
| Design & Build | ||
| Water Resistance | — | IP48 |
| Form Factor | bar | flip |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.20 kg |
| Fingerprint | — | Yes |
| Face Recognition | — | ✓★ |
| OS | KaiOS | Android |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✗ |
| Stereo Speakers | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Nokia 110 TA-1667 Titanium 128GB
- Below average camera (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average social proof (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average display (15th percentile)15th %ile
Motorola Razr ultra 2025 Pantone Scarab 512GB
- Strong performance (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Pricing
Nokia 110 TA-1667 Titanium 128GB0.298score per dollar
vs
Motorola Razr ultra 2025 Pantone Scarab 512GB0.131score per dollar
Nokia 110 TA-1667 Titanium 128GB offers 2.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Motorola Razr ultra 2025
Scores 92 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 23 of 38 specs.
