LG UltraWide 34WK95C-W 34" Black

LG UltraWide 34WK95C-W 34" Black

LG
47 Overall Score
vs
ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 32" 2025

ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 32" 2025

ASUS
91 Overall Score

Scores

Creative
LG
45
ASUS
100
Professional
LG
39
ASUS
96
Office
LG
34
ASUS
89
Entertainment
LG
48
ASUS
86
Gaming
LG
40
ASUS
82
Portable
LG
10
ASUS
17

Specifications

LG UltraWide 34WK95C-W 34"ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 32"
Display
Size34"31.5"
Resolution2560 x 14403840 x 2160
Panel TypeNano-IPSOLED
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate60 Hz240 Hz
Response Time0.10000000149011612 ms
Adaptive SyncAdaptive-Sync
Color & HDR
Brightness250 nits250 nits
Color Gamut98% DCI-P3100% sRGB, 99% DCI-P3
Color Depth10-bit
HDRDisplayHDR 400HDR10/Dolby Vision/Hybrid Log Ga
HDR SupportHDR400Dolby Vision
Connectivity
HDMI Ports21
DisplayPort10
USB-C12
ThunderboltThunderbolt 4
Speakers
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power31W
Weight7.26 kg9.00 kg

Pros & Cons

LG UltraWide 34WK95C-W 34" Black

  • Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong connectivity (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong display (75th percentile)
  • Strong color (71st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average ergonomic (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average performance (22nd percentile)

ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 32" 2025

  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong color (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

LG UltraWide 34WK95C-W 34" Black0.035score per dollar
vs
ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 32" 20250.059score per dollar

ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 32" 2025 offers 1.7x better value for money

LG UltraWide 34WK95C-W 34" Black

Verdict

Winner: ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 32"

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 28 specs.

ASUS ProArt PA32UCDM 32" Better at:

GamingOfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment

Also Consider