Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 26.5" Black 2025

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 26.5" Black 2025

Gigabyte
90 Overall Score
vs
MSI MAG 274QRFW X32 27" White 2025

MSI MAG 274QRFW X32 27" White 2025

MSI
75 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 26.5" Black 2025

90 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This QD-OLED monitor delivers outstanding picture quality and color accuracy at a very competitive price, especially when bought on sale. Users praise its 240Hz refresh rate, glossy screen for vibrant HDR gaming, and elegant stand. While the built-in speakers are weak and it lacks DP 2.1, the overall value and performance are highly rated, with AI features noted as helpful for burn-in prevention.

Pros
  • outstanding picture quality
  • great color accuracy
  • 240Hz refresh rate
  • glossy screen for HDR
  • elegant stand
Cons
  • weak built-in speakers
  • no DP 2.1 support
  • glossy screen reflections in bright rooms
👍 Picture quality 5
👍 Color accuracy 4
👍 Refresh rate 3
👍 Value for money 3
👎 Built in speakers 2
👎 Connectivity 2

MSI MAG 274QRFW X32 27" White 2025

78 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

The MSI monitor receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its picture quality, color accuracy, and high refresh rate of 320Hz, making it a great value for gaming. However, one verified review highlights serious issues with the audio output via the aux port, describing it as weak and tinny, and the included DisplayPort cable was defective. The RGB lighting on the back is considered useless by some. Overall, the monitor is praised for its performance and aesthetics, but potential buyers should be aware of the audio limitations.

Pros
  • Excellent picture quality
  • Vibrant colors
  • High 320Hz refresh rate
  • Great value for money
  • Good build quality
Cons
  • Weak audio via aux port
  • Defective included DisplayPort cable
  • Useless RGB lighting on back
  • Slightly pricey
👍 Picture quality 5
👍 Refresh rate 3
👍 Value for money 4
👎 Audio quality 1
🤔 Build quality 2
👎 Rgb lighting 1

Scores

Gaming
Gigabyte
84
MSI
75
Office
Gigabyte
83
MSI
75
Professional
Gigabyte
83
MSI
74
Creative
Gigabyte
80
MSI
72
Entertainment
Gigabyte
75
MSI
64
Portable
Gigabyte
13
MSI
7

Specifications

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 26.5"MSI MAG 274QRFW X32 27"
Display
Size27"27"
Resolution3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Panel TypeQD-OLED★IPS
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved✗✗
Screen Finishmattematte
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz320 Hz★
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms★0.5 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium Pro★FreeSync
Color & HDR
Brightness250 nits400 nits★
Color Gamut99% DCI-P3129% sRGB
Color Depth10-bit★8-bit + FRC
HDRDisplayHDR 400DisplayHDR 400
HDR SupportHDR400HDR400
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C1★0
Speakers✗✗
Headphone Jack✓✓
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable✓✓
Tilt✓✓
Swivel✓✓
Pivot✓✓
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam✗✗
Touchscreen✗✗
PIP/PBP✓★✗
Power45W★—
Weight7.11 kg★9.30 kg

Pros & Cons

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 26.5" Black 2025

  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile

MSI MAG 274QRFW X32 27" White 2025

  • Strong performance (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong color (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong display (72nd percentile)
  • Below average portability (13th percentile)13th %ile

Pricing

MSI MAG 274QRFW X32 27" White 2025 is $370 cheaper (2.3x less).

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 26.5" Black 20250.138score per dollar
vs
MSI MAG 274QRFW X32 27" White 20250.266score per dollar

MSI MAG 274QRFW X32 27" White 2025 offers 1.9x better value for money

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 26.5" Black 2025

MSI MAG 274QRFW X32 27" White 2025

Verdict

★ Winner: Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 26.5"

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 29 specs.

Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 26.5" Better at:

GamingOfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment

Also Consider