LG 27UP600K-W 27" Silver
LG
49 Overall Score
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
92 Overall Score
Scores
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| LG 27UP600K-W 27" | Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 5 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | DCI-P3 95% | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | 1.07 Billion | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | — | 3★ |
| Speakers | — | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100 x 100mm | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | 40W★ | 140W |
| Weight | 4.30 kg★ | 6.90 kg |
Pros & Cons
LG 27UP600K-W 27" Silver
- Strong display (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong color (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (74th percentile)
- Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (28th percentile)
- Below average portability (33rd percentile)
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Pricing
LG 27UP600K-W 27" Silver0.093score per dollar
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 20250.153score per dollar
Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27" Silver 2025 offers 1.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SF 27"
Scores 92 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 28 specs.
