CAPERAVE CU17
CAPERAVE
62 Overall Score
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
MSI
95 Overall Score
Scores
Portable
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Specifications
| CAPERAVE CU17 | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 17.3" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | — | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | — | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 500 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 100% Adobe RGB | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | 2★ | 1 |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 3.0 or USB 3.1 Type C DP ALT-MODE | — |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 1.00 kg★ | 8.00 kg |
Pros & Cons
CAPERAVE CU17
- Strong portability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong color (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average performance (22nd percentile)
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
Pricing
CAPERAVE CU170.250score per dollar
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 20260.193score per dollar
CAPERAVE CU17 offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 28 specs.
