ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
ASUS
96 Overall Score
vs
Samsung Odyssey LS27CG552ENXZA 27" Black 2024
Samsung
77 Overall Score
Scores
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" | Samsung Odyssey LS27CG552ENXZA 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,000 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 165 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | FreeSync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 16.7 Million Colors (8-Bit) |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | 8-bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 2★ | 0 |
| Thunderbolt | — | 0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 75x75 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Power | 25W★ | 40W |
| Weight | 6.70 kg | 4.08 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
Samsung Odyssey LS27CG552ENXZA 27" Black 2024
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong performance (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong connectivity (78th percentile)
Pricing
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 20240.174score per dollar
vs
Samsung Odyssey LS27CG552ENXZA 27" Black 20240.432score per dollar
Samsung Odyssey LS27CG552ENXZA 27" Black 2024 offers 2.5x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5"
Scores 96 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 30 specs.
