Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
83 Overall Score
vs
Hasselblad XCD XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm
Hasselblad
30 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Travel
Budget
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Macro
Specifications
| Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | Hasselblad XCD XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 20 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 16 |
| Groups | 8 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 4★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | 3.2-4.5 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Hasselblad X |
| Format | APS-C★ | medium-format |
| Weight | 0.12 kg★ | 0.81 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | PZ | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 249 mm★ | 320 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x★ | 0.09 to 0.16x |
Pros & Cons
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong aperture (77th percentile)
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
Hasselblad XCD XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm
- Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong versatility (70th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (21st percentile)
Pricing
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.279score per dollar
vs
Hasselblad XCD XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm0.005score per dollar
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm offers 55.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 83 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.
