Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
82 Overall Score
vs
Ulanzi WL-1 18mm

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm

Ulanzi
64 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Sony
84
Ulanzi
51
Travel
Sony
82
Ulanzi
34
Portrait
Sony
80
Ulanzi
65
Budget
Sony
80
Ulanzi
57
Macro
Sony
61
Ulanzi
79
Wildlife Sports
Sony
73
Ulanzi
43
Video Cinema
Sony
71
Ulanzi
45
Professional
Sony
69
Ulanzi
46
Landscape
Sony
68
Ulanzi
40

Specifications

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mmUlanzi WL-1 18mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm18 mm
Elements9
Groups8
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements11
Coating30-Layer Nano-Coating Double-Side
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony Esony
FormatAPS-C
Weight0.12 kg
Filter Thread41 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypePZ
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance249 mm18 mm
Max Magnification0.215x10X

Pros & Cons

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm

  • Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (75th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (73th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (69th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm is $248 cheaper (6.0x less).

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.277score per dollar
vs
Ulanzi WL-1 18mm1.273score per dollar

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm offers 4.6x better value for money

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm

Verdict

Winner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 82 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Ulanzi WL-1 18mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider