Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
98 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6
Canon
36 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Travel
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Professional
Street
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 75 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 20 | — |
| Groups | 14 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | water- and oil-repellent coating | Super Spectra Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | 32-45★ |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.7 | 4-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.61 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 58 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | HLA | DC |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 6 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 170 mm★ | 1.49 m |
| Max Magnification | 1:2★ | 0.25x |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6
- Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average macro (30th percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.141score per dollar
vs
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.60.196score per dollar
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
