TTArtisan AF 50mm F1.8 Neo 50mm
TTArtisan
49 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
82 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Specifications
| TTArtisan AF 50mm F1.8 Neo 50mm | Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 50 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 12 | 9 |
| Groups | 8 | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | 2 | 2 |
| Coating | — | Nano-GI coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/50 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.16 kg | 0.13 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 480 mm | 350 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:7★ |
Pros & Cons
TTArtisan AF 50mm F1.8 Neo 50mm
- Strong build (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average aperture (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
TTArtisan AF 50mm F1.8 Neo 50mm0.549score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm0.340score per dollar
TTArtisan AF 50mm F1.8 Neo 50mm offers 1.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Scores 82 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
