Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm

Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm

Sony
84 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di II B016N 16-300mm

Tamron Di II B016N 16-300mm

Tamron
72 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sony
87
Tamron
63
Budget
Sony
87
Tamron
76
Portrait
Sony
82
Tamron
76
Macro
Sony
68
Tamron
79
Street
Sony
79
Tamron
66
Travel
Sony
78
Tamron
67
Landscape
Sony
78
Tamron
63
Video Cinema
Sony
76
Tamron
65
Wildlife Sports
Sony
70
Tamron
61

Specifications

Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mmTamron Di II B016N 16-300mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min20 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm300 mm
Elements1616
Groups1312
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements4
Coatingfluorine coatingsmultiple layers of coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountSony ENikon F
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.49 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusPiezo Drive
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm300 mm
Max Magnification0.39x1:2.9

Pros & Cons

Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile

Tamron Di II B016N 16-300mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Pricing

Tamron Di II B016N 16-300mm is $597 cheaper (2.3x less).

Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm0.081score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di II B016N 16-300mm0.162score per dollar

Tamron Di II B016N 16-300mm offers 2.0x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Tamron Di II B016N 16-300mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider