BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm
BLAZAR LENS
55 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
98 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Travel
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Professional
Street
Specifications
| BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 33 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 85 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | — | 20 |
| Groups | — | 14 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 5★ |
| Coating | — | water- and oil-repellent coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | T2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 3.5-6.7 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 16★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 0.61 kg |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | HLA |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 170 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:2★ |
Pros & Cons
BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong versatility (78th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
Pricing
BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm0.022score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.141score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 6.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
