Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Sirui Sniper 16mm f/1.2 16mm

Sirui Sniper 16mm f/1.2 16mm

Sirui
66 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Sirui Sniper 16mm f/1.2 16mm

85 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

The Sirui Sniper 16mm f/1.2 lens receives high praise for its build quality, sharpness, and value for money, especially on APS-C cameras like the Sony a6400 and Nikon Z50. Users highlight its sturdy construction and excellent image quality, with one reviewer calling it the best bang for your buck in wide-angle APS-C lenses. However, a Q&A warns that using it on a full-frame camera may cause vignetting and distortion.

Pros
  • Excellent build quality
  • Sharp images and videos
  • Great value for money
  • Sturdy and high-quality feel
  • Fast autofocus
Cons
  • Vignetting on full-frame cameras
  • Distortion on full-frame cameras
  • No aperture ring
  • Limited to APS-C sensor size
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Image quality 3
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Autofocus performance 2
👍 Compatibility with aps c 3
👎 Full frame issues 1

Scores

Budget
Tamron
95
Sirui
64
Macro
Tamron
91
Sirui
58
Portrait
Tamron
87
Sirui
60
Landscape
Tamron
86
Sirui
52
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
85
Sirui
50
Professional
Tamron
85
Sirui
59
Video Cinema
Tamron
81
Sirui
68
Street
Tamron
81
Sirui
62
Travel
Tamron
81
Sirui
50

Specifications

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXDSirui Sniper 16mm f/1.2 16mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm16 mm
Elements2014
Groups135
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements23★
Coatingfluorine coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades913★
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.59 kg0.38 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motor★STM
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★300 mm
Max Magnification1:2.8★0.5x

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Sirui Sniper 16mm f/1.2 16mm

  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong optical (73rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.357score per dollar
vs
Sirui Sniper 16mm f/1.2 16mm0.220score per dollar

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD offers 1.6x better value for money

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Sirui Sniper 16mm f/1.2 16mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider