Sigma 258205

Sigma 258205

Sigma
80 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

Canon
48 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sigma
93
Canon
36
Professional
Sigma
83
Canon
33
Portrait
Sigma
82
Canon
24
Video Cinema
Sigma
82
Canon
34
Budget
Sigma
77
Canon
60
Street
Sigma
73
Canon
41
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
72
Canon
43
Landscape
Sigma
66
Canon
55
Travel
Sigma
56
Canon
58

Specifications

Sigma 258205Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min105 mm75 mm
Focal Length Max105 mm300 mm
Elements1713
Groups129
Aspherical Elements1★0
ED Elements2★—
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/75
Min Aperturef/2.84-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountCanon EFCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.72 kg0.48 kg★
Filter Thread62 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMDC
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance305 mm★1.50 m
Max Magnification1:1★0.25x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 258205

  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average aperture (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average macro (30th percentile)

Pricing

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III is $205 cheaper (2.5x less).

Sigma 2582050.233score per dollar
vs
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III0.342score per dollar

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III offers 1.5x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma 258205

Scores 80 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma 258205 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Better at:

Travel

Also Consider