Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

Rokinon
46 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm

Panasonic
85 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Rokinon
45
Panasonic
86
Portrait
Rokinon
32
Panasonic
85
Street
Rokinon
50
Panasonic
84
Professional
Rokinon
39
Panasonic
81
Travel
Rokinon
47
Panasonic
78
Wildlife Sports
Rokinon
41
Panasonic
78
Landscape
Rokinon
44
Panasonic
75
Macro
Rokinon
36
Panasonic
72
Video Cinema
Rokinon
36
Panasonic
71

Specifications

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm60 mm
Elements711
Groups69
Aspherical Elements12
ED Elements3
CoatingUltra Multi CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony EL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.09 kg0.35 kg
Filter Thread49 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto Focusstepping motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm150 mm
Max Magnification0.12x0.43x

Pros & Cons

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (81st percentile)81st %ile

Pricing

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm is $147 cheaper (1.7x less).

Verdict

Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider