Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Tamron
97 Overall Score
vs
TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm

TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm

TTArtisan
33 Overall Score

Scores

Video Cinema
Tamron
98
TTArtisan
28
Budget
Tamron
96
TTArtisan
28
Macro
Tamron
95
TTArtisan
42
Professional
Tamron
92
TTArtisan
31
Travel
Tamron
87
TTArtisan
25
Portrait
Tamron
85
TTArtisan
35
Landscape
Tamron
84
TTArtisan
28
Street
Tamron
79
TTArtisan
34
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
75
TTArtisan
23

Specifications

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mmTTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min17 mm21 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm21 mm
Elements1613
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements2★—
CoatingFluorine Coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.5
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades910★
Build
MountSony ELeica M
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.54 kg0.41 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeRXDmanual focus only
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★700 mm
Max Magnification1:4.8★—

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile

TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm

  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm is $354 cheaper (2.4x less).

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.162score per dollar
vs
TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm0.136score per dollar

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm offers 1.2x better value for money

TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider