Viltrox 56mm f1.2 Z 56mm

Viltrox 56mm f1.2 Z 56mm

Viltrox
54 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox 56mm f1.2 Z 56mm

82 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

The VILTROX 56mm F1.2 lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, fast and quiet autofocus, excellent low-light performance, and great value for money. A few users note a floating element or internal rattling when off, which is explained as normal VCM motor behavior. One verified buyer received a used lens instead of new, and another found it too large for a compact body.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Great low-light performance
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Floating element design
  • Internal rattling when off
  • Received used instead of new
  • Too large for compact bodies
  • Autofocus hunting in extreme low light
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 7
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Low light performance 4
🤔 Floating element rattle 4

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Budget
Viltrox
52
Tamron
96
Macro
Viltrox
48
Tamron
91
Landscape
Viltrox
52
Tamron
86
Portrait
Viltrox
53
Tamron
85
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
52
Tamron
85
Professional
Viltrox
61
Tamron
84
Video Cinema
Viltrox
60
Tamron
81
Travel
Viltrox
45
Tamron
81
Street
Viltrox
50
Tamron
81

Specifications

Viltrox 56mm f1.2 Z 56mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typestandardzoom
Focal Length Min56 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm300 mm
Elements1320
Groups813
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements12★
CoatingNano coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/1.24-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.59 kg0.59 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVCMVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.13x1:2.8★

Pros & Cons

Viltrox 56mm f1.2 Z 56mm

  • Strong stabilization (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong optical (68th percentile)
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Pricing

Viltrox 56mm f1.2 Z 56mm is $100 cheaper (1.6x less).

Viltrox 56mm f1.2 Z 56mm0.301score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.357score per dollar

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD offers 1.2x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider