Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm
Tamron
55 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
Nikon
75 Overall Score
Scores
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Budget
Travel
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Specifications
| Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 400 mm |
| Elements | — | 21 |
| Groups | — | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | XR Di VC | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/6.3 | 22-45★ |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | 4-8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg★ | 0.72 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Built in Motor | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 67 mm★ | 200 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:2.86★ |
Pros & Cons
Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average build (24th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
- Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Pricing
Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm0.092score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm0.065score per dollar
Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
Scores 75 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.
