Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
85 Overall Score
vs
PERGEAR 35mm F1.4 35mm

PERGEAR 35mm F1.4 35mm

PERGEAR
38 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Canon
97
PERGEAR
31
Portrait
Canon
89
PERGEAR
34
Video Cinema
Canon
89
PERGEAR
31
Street
Canon
80
PERGEAR
28
Travel
Canon
76
PERGEAR
22
Wildlife Sports
Canon
72
PERGEAR
24
Landscape
Canon
72
PERGEAR
28
Macro
Canon
71
PERGEAR
54
Professional
Canon
70
PERGEAR
28

Specifications

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USMPERGEAR 35mm F1.4 35mm
Optics
Typezoomstandard
Focal Length Min18 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm35 mm
Elements16—
Groups12—
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra Coatingmulti-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.4
Constant✗—
Diaphragm Blades710★
Build
MountCanon EF-SL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗—
Weight0.52 kg★—
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★manual focus only
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm300 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x★—

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

PERGEAR 35mm F1.4 35mm

  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average build (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

PERGEAR 35mm F1.4 35mm is $136 cheaper (2.4x less).

PERGEAR 35mm F1.4 35mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider