Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm
Tamron
60 Overall Score
vs
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm
TTArtisan
58 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Travel
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Specifications
| Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm | TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | — |
| Focal Length Min | 10 mm | 27 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 24 mm | 27 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/10 | f/27 |
| Min Aperture | f/3.5 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-S | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weight | 0.41 kg | 0.20 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Micromotor-type AF motor | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 240 mm | 27 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:51★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong macro (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong versatility (76th percentile)
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm
- Strong macro (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm0.170score per dollar
vs
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm0.359score per dollar
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm offers 2.1x better value for money
Verdict
Tie
Both products are closely matched - Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm wins 2 specs while TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm wins 3.
