Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mm

Nikon
46 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon
86 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Nikon
49
Canon
90
Street
Nikon
49
Canon
89
Budget
Nikon
39
Canon
84
Landscape
Nikon
38
Canon
80
Portrait
Nikon
34
Canon
79
Macro
Nikon
50
Canon
77
Video Cinema
Nikon
42
Canon
76
Professional
Nikon
48
Canon
72
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
46
Canon
69

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mmCanon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min35 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm200 mm
Elements816
Groups712
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—2★
Coating—Super Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.73.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★6
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.22 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread52 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★DC Micro Motor
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance160 mm★457 mm
Max Magnification0.67x★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mm

  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (25th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (31st percentile)
  • Below average optical (31st percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mm is $175 cheaper (1.5x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 20131 35mm0.132score per dollar
vs
Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS0.165score per dollar

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS offers 1.3x better value for money

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider