Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Sony FE SEL2860 28-60mm

Sony FE SEL2860 28-60mm

Sony
29 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
98
Sony
37
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
Sony
49
Travel
Nikon
92
Sony
40
Landscape
Nikon
88
Sony
42
Professional
Nikon
83
Sony
38
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sony
32
Street
Nikon
81
Sony
36
Portrait
Nikon
78
Sony
21
Macro
Nikon
74
Sony
20

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRSony FE SEL2860 28-60mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min24 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm60 mm
Elements19—
Groups15—
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements1★—
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/32
Min Aperture4-6.3f/4
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.57 kg★—
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorLinear motor★
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm★—
Max Magnification0.28x★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Sony FE SEL2860 28-60mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile

Pricing

Sony FE SEL2860 28-60mm is $474 cheaper (2.9x less).

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider