Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm
Sony
48 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Macro
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 16 mm |
| Elements | 19 | 5 |
| Groups | 15 | 5 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Coating | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 4-6.3 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.57 kg | 0.07 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 49 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor★ | Auto Focus |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 240 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.28x★ | 0.078x |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.123score per dollar
vs
Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm0.173score per dollar
Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
