Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
92 Overall Score
vs
Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm

Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm

Sirui
70 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

82 out of 100 high confidence 117 reviews

The Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS lens is widely praised as an excellent all-in-one travel and walkaround lens for APS-C E-mount cameras. Users consistently highlight its sharpness, compact size, light weight, and versatile 27-200mm equivalent zoom range. While many note it is not ideal for low light and some report significant vignetting at the wide end, the overall sentiment is very positive, with most considering it a great value kit lens upgrade.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile 27-200mm equivalent zoom range
  • Effective optical image stabilization
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Significant vignetting at 18mm wide end
  • Not ideal for low light photography
  • Variable aperture limits brightness at telephoto
  • Some copies may have quality control issues
  • Slight autofocus lag compared to premium lenses
👍 Image quality 35
👍 Build quality 12
👍 Value for money 18
👎 Vignetting 6
👎 Low light performance 10
👍 Zoom range 25

Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm

45 out of 100 low confidence 6 reviews

The Sirui Aurora 35mm f/1.4 lens receives mixed reviews. Some users praise its value for money, compact size, and smooth autofocus, while others report severe sharpness issues and poor corner performance. A verified buyer called it the worst lens they've ever seen, but another verified buyer says it's an amazing deal compared to the Sony GM. The Q&A confirms a 62mm filter thread.

Pros
  • Great value for money
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Smooth autofocus for video
  • Beautiful bokeh at f/1.4
  • Good build quality
Cons
  • Inconsistent sharpness across copies
  • Poor corner performance
  • Chromatic aberration present
  • Autofocus not as snappy as Sony GM
  • Some users report terrible image quality
🤔 Sharpness 4
👍 Value for money 3
🤔 Autofocus performance 3
👍 Build quality 2
👍 Bokeh 2
👎 Corner performance 2

Scores

Budget
Sony
96
Sirui
61
Macro
Sony
68
Sirui
90
Street
Sony
89
Sirui
75
Portrait
Sony
89
Sirui
87
Travel
Sony
89
Sirui
57
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Sirui
63
Professional
Sony
74
Sirui
83
Video Cinema
Sony
82
Sirui
79
Landscape
Sony
76
Sirui
71

Specifications

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSSirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min18 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm35 mm
Elements1616
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements2★1
Coating—Protective Fluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/1.4
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades715★
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.33 kg★0.49 kg
Filter Thread55 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motor★step motor
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm35 mm★
Max Magnification0.29x1:7.14★

Pros & Cons

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.183score per dollar
vs
Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm0.127score per dollar

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 1.4x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm Better at:

MacroProfessional

Also Consider