Fujifilm XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 50-150mm
Fujifilm
74 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Tamron
100 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Macro
Professional
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Street
Travel
Specifications
| Fujifilm XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 50-150mm | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 50 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 150 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 23 | 20 |
| Groups | 16 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 6★ | 2 |
| Coating | Nano-GI (Gradient Index) coating | fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.99 kg | 0.59 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Triple Linear Motor | VXD linear motor |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:3.8★ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 50-150mm
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 50-150mm0.039score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.418score per dollar
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD offers 10.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
