Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
62 Overall Score
vs
Desiontal 420-800mm

Desiontal 420-800mm

Desiontal
37 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

78 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews

This lens is widely praised for its excellent optics, lightweight design, and quiet STM autofocus, making it a great everyday and travel lens. Users note it rivals Canon's L-series in image quality while being much more affordable, though some mention the plastic mount and lack of weather sealing as drawbacks. Verified buyers highlight its sharpness, effective image stabilization, and value for money, especially when purchased as a kit lens. However, a few users report limitations with autofocus points on certain camera bodies and note it is not a true macro lens.

Pros
  • Excellent image quality rivaling L-series
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Quiet and smooth STM autofocus
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Plastic mount instead of metal
  • No weather sealing
  • Limited autofocus points on some bodies
  • Not a true macro lens
  • Inferior image quality to 18-135mm
👍 Image quality 6
🤔 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Autofocus performance 4
👍 Image stabilization 3
👍 Weight and portability 4

Desiontal 420-800mm

72 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

This 420-800mm manual telephoto zoom lens receives mixed feedback. Many users praise its value for astrophotography and long-distance shots, noting good build quality and lightweight design. However, some report issues with color accuracy at long range, difficulty focusing, and one case of incompatibility. Overall, it is seen as a budget-friendly option for amateur photographers willing to work manually.

Pros
  • Budget-friendly for astrophotography
  • Lightweight and portable design
  • Good build quality
  • Versatile 420-800mm range
  • Effective for moon and stars
Cons
  • Color accuracy issues at long distances
  • Difficult to focus manually
  • Heavy for some users
  • Incompatibility with some cameras
  • Requires tripod and remote shutter
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Manual focus 5
🤔 Weight 3
👎 Color accuracy 1
👎 Compatibility 1

Scores

Travel
Canon
72
Desiontal
34
Macro
Canon
70
Desiontal
40
Budget
Canon
65
Desiontal
45
Landscape
Canon
64
Desiontal
37
Street
Canon
60
Desiontal
31
Wildlife Sports
Canon
59
Desiontal
31
Video Cinema
Canon
54
Desiontal
35
Professional
Canon
51
Desiontal
30
Portrait
Canon
35
Desiontal
37

Specifications

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STMDesiontal 420-800mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min18 mm420 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm800 mm
Elements12—
Groups10—
Aspherical Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingUltra Multi Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/16
Min Aperture4-5.68.3-16
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountCanon EF-SSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weight0.21 kg★0.80 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★manual focus only
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★800 mm
Max Magnification1:4★—

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Desiontal 420-800mm

  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong versatility (70th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (67th percentile)
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average build (23rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)

Pricing

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Desiontal 420-800mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Scores 62 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 20 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider