TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm
TTArtisan
56 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Macro
Specifications
| TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 7 | 19 |
| Groups | 5 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/0.95 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/0.95 | 4-6.3 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.42 kg★ | 0.57 kg |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 350 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.28x★ |
Pros & Cons
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm
- Strong aperture (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong macro (67th percentile)
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Pricing
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm0.268score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.123score per dollar
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm offers 2.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
