Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR
Nikon
28 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 120 mm |
| Elements | 17 | — |
| Groups | 13 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 1★ | — |
| ED Elements | 4★ | — |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | 4-7.1 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Nikon F |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.41 kg★ | 0.57 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Stabilization Stops | 6.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 140 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR
- Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Pricing
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.111score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR0.095score per dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.
