Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm
67 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
95
Fujifilm
58
Budget
Panasonic
91
Fujifilm
61
Landscape
Panasonic
86
Fujifilm
57
Travel
Panasonic
86
Fujifilm
53
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Fujifilm
57
Street
Panasonic
80
Fujifilm
59
Professional
Panasonic
80
Fujifilm
65
Portrait
Panasonic
78
Fujifilm
51
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Fujifilm
52

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmFujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm16 mm
Elements1713
Groups1311
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements4★2
CoatingFluorine coatingNano-GI and HT-EBC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountL-MountFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg0.38 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★150 mm
Max Magnification0.5x★0.21x

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm is $198 cheaper (1.3x less).

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider