Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di II AFB028N700 400mm

Tamron Di II AFB028N700 400mm

Tamron
80 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
96
Tamron
69
Budget
Panasonic
92
Tamron
78
Landscape
Panasonic
90
Tamron
58
Travel
Panasonic
90
Tamron
74
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Tamron
57
Professional
Panasonic
86
Tamron
58
Portrait
Panasonic
84
Tamron
68
Street
Panasonic
83
Tamron
57
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
82
Tamron
61

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mmTamron Di II AFB028N700 400mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm400 mm
Elements17
Groups13
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/3.5
Min Aperture4-7.13.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-MountCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg0.70 kg
Filter Thread67 mm79 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusHLD
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm79 mm
Max Magnification0.5x1:2.9

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Tamron Di II AFB028N700 400mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Tamron Di II AFB028N700 400mm

Verdict

Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider