Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
85 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF56mmF1.2 R WR 56mm

Fujifilm XF56mmF1.2 R WR 56mm

Fujifilm
72 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

75 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 MACRO O.I.S. lens is widely praised for its compact size, versatile zoom range, and macro capability, making it an ideal travel companion. Users appreciate the optical stabilization and the convenience of not swapping lenses, though some note softness at extreme ends and a slow aperture. Overall, it's a solid all-in-one solution for outdoor and travel photography.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile zoom range (28-200mm)
  • Macro capability
  • Effective optical stabilization
  • Convenient all-in-one travel lens
Cons
  • Soft at wide and telephoto ends
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Not ideal for low light without stabilization
  • Requires stopping down for sharpness
👍 Compactness 5
👍 Versatility 4
🤔 Image quality 4
👎 Aperture speed 4
👍 Stabilization 3
👍 Macro capability 2

Fujifilm XF56mmF1.2 R WR 56mm

82 out of 100 high confidence 45 reviews

The Fuji XF 56mm f/1.2 WR is widely praised for its stunning optical quality, producing sharp, contrasty images with beautiful bokeh. Many users consider it an ideal portrait lens, though some note its autofocus is not the fastest and the lens is not weather-sealed on all versions. A few reviewers reported issues with build quality, including dust inside the lens, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness wide open
  • Beautiful bokeh and subject isolation
  • Solid all-metal build quality
Cons
  • No weather sealing on some versions
  • Audible autofocus motor noise
  • Aperture ring easily bumped
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Bokeh 14
👎 Autofocus performance 10
🤔 Build quality 9
👎 Weather sealing 6
👎 Aperture ring 4

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
96
Fujifilm
68
Budget
Panasonic
90
Fujifilm
70
Travel
Panasonic
90
Fujifilm
56
Portrait
Panasonic
84
Fujifilm
89
Landscape
Panasonic
86
Fujifilm
55
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Fujifilm
75
Professional
Panasonic
81
Fujifilm
79
Street
Panasonic
80
Fujifilm
75
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Fujifilm
58

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mmFujifilm XF56mmF1.2 R WR 56mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm56 mm
Elements1713
Groups138
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements4★1
CoatingFluorine coatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/1.2
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades911★
Build
MountL-MountFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm56 mm★
Max Magnification0.5x★0.14x

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Fujifilm XF56mmF1.2 R WR 56mm

  • Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong build (75th percentile)
  • Strong optical (74th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.107score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF56mmF1.2 R WR 56mm0.080score per dollar

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm offers 1.3x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Fujifilm XF56mmF1.2 R WR 56mm Better at:

Portrait

Also Consider