Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Panasonic
86 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 35mm f/1.7 35mm
Nikon
32 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 35mm f/1.7 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 8 |
| Groups | 13 | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1★ | — |
| ED Elements | 4★ | — |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | 4-7.1 | f/1.7 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.41 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Automatic/manual |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 6.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 140 mm★ | 160 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x | 0.67x★ |
Pros & Cons
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 35mm f/1.7 35mm
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong macro (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
Pricing
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.108score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX MC 35mm f/1.7 35mm0.071score per dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm offers 1.5x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
