Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG 200mm
Sigma
51 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG 200mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 200 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 18 | 17 |
| Groups | 14 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | L-Mount |
| Format | Full-Frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:2★ | 0.5x |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG 200mm
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong macro (78th percentile)
- Strong optical (74th percentile)
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG 200mm0.051score per dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.111score per dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm offers 2.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
