Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

Fujifilm
32 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

No customer feedback yet

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Budget
Fujifilm
25
Tamron
94
Macro
Fujifilm
50
Tamron
91
Portrait
Fujifilm
25
Tamron
88
Landscape
Fujifilm
37
Tamron
86
Professional
Fujifilm
48
Tamron
84
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
46
Tamron
84
Street
Fujifilm
36
Tamron
81
Travel
Fujifilm
30
Tamron
81
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
38
Tamron
80

Specifications

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min33 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max33 mm300 mm
Elements1020
Groups—13
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements3★2
Coating—fluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/33f/4
Min Aperturef/1.44-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight—0.59 kg★
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motorVXD linear motor
Stabilization—✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2.8★

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (69th percentile)
  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Pricing

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD is $669 cheaper (3.4x less).

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm0.034score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.357score per dollar

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD offers 10.5x better value for money

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider