Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm

Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm

Tamron
50 Overall Score
vs
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon
64 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews

Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the Tamron 70-300mm lens for its excellent value for money, delivering sharp images and solid build quality at a fraction of the cost of brand-name alternatives. Many users highlight its impressive performance for wildlife and bird photography, although some note that the autofocus can be slow in low light and there are occasional issues with chromatic aberration. While a few mention the lack of image stabilization on certain models, most find it manageable with steady hands or a tripod.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Sharp image quality throughout zoom range
  • Solid build and sturdy construction
  • Good for wildlife and bird photography
  • Effective vibration compensation (VC)
Cons
  • Slow autofocus in low light
  • Occasional chromatic aberration (purple/green fringing)
  • No vibration reduction on some models
  • Autofocus can hunt and struggle on small subjects
  • Zoom ring not always smooth
👍 Value for money 12
👍 Image quality 14
👍 Build quality 9
🤔 Autofocus performance 8
👎 Chromatic aberration 6
🤔 Image stabilization 7

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

78 out of 100 high confidence 459 reviews

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and robust build quality. Many users consider it a workhorse for sports, portraits, and low-light photography, though the lack of image stabilization is a notable drawback for some. A significant number of reviews highlight the lens's weight and the potential for focus inconsistencies, particularly with moving subjects. Concerns about Canon's support for older models and the tripod collar design also appear in negative feedback.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness and image quality
  • Fast and silent autofocus (USM)
  • Excellent for low-light photography
  • Versatile for sports and portraits
  • Robust build quality
Cons
  • No image stabilization
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Tripod collar design issues
  • Inconsistent autofocus with moving subjects
  • Canon no longer supports repairs
👍 Image quality 35
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Build quality 22
👎 Weight and size 18
👎 Image stabilization 15
👍 Value for money 12

Scores

Landscape
Tamron
51
Canon
87
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
39
Canon
76
Video Cinema
Tamron
38
Canon
74
Budget
Tamron
53
Canon
71
Travel
Tamron
47
Canon
69
Professional
Tamron
35
Canon
69
Macro
Tamron
50
Canon
59
Street
Tamron
36
Canon
56
Portrait
Tamron
29
Canon
49

Specifications

Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mmCanon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min70 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm200 mm
Elements1317
Groups913
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements25★
Coating—Air Sphere Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/32
Min Aperture4.0-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ACanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.77 kg★1.07 kg
Filter Thread62 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusUSM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance950 mm700 mm★
Max Magnification1:2★0.3x

Pros & Cons

Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm

  • Strong versatility (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Strong user sentiment (66th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average build (23rd percentile)

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm is $691 cheaper (2.5x less).

Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm0.112score per dollar
vs
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM0.056score per dollar

Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm offers 2.0x better value for money

Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Scores 64 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider